New Mexico Register / Volume XXXIV, Issue 23 / December 5,
2023
TITLE 18 TRANSPORTATION
AND HIGHWAYS
CHAPTER 28 HIGHWAY CONTRACTING
AND BIDDING
PART 6 TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER GENERAL CONTRACTOR RULE
18.28.6.1 ISSUING
AGENCY: The New Mexico Department
of Transportation, PO Box 1149, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87504-1149.
[18.28.6.1 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.2 SCOPE: This rule applies to the New Mexico Department
of Transportation construction projects.
[18.28.6.2 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.3 STATUTORY
AUTHORITY: Sections 13-1-122.1
through 13-1-122.4 NMSA 1978 (2022), Section 67-3-8.4 NMSA 1978 (2022), Section
67-3-11 NMSA 1978 (2003), Section 67-3-14 NMSA 1978 (2003); 23 USC Section
112(b), 23 CFR Section 635.504.
[18.28.6.3 NMAC - N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.4 DURATION: Permanent.
[18.28.6.4 NMAC - N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2023, unless a later date is cited
at the end of a section.
[18.28.6.5 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.6 OBJECTIVE: To establish procedures for the solicitation
and award of a construction manager general contractor project delivery
procurement method for department transportation projects. The construction manager general contractor
project delivery method may be used to improve project quality, completion time
and costs through early collaborative project development participation. This rule provides additional requirements
and procedures for use of the construction manager general contractor project
delivery method and is to be used in conjunction with the statutory
requirements found in the transportation construction manager general
contractor act, Sections 13-1-122.1 through 13-1-122.4 NMSA 1978.
[18.28.6.6 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.7 DEFINITIONS:
A. All definitions in the procurement code.
B. “CMGC” means construction manager general
contractor.
C. “Department” means the New Mexico department of transportation.
D. “GMP” means guaranteed maximum price.
E. “RFP” means request for proposals.
[18.28.6.7 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.8 USE OF CMGC
DELIVERY METHOD: The department may use a CMGC project delivery
method after making written determination that a transportation project is
eligible for procurement using the alternate method and posting the same on the
department’s website for 90 days.
A. Project selection criteria: To determine whether a project is eligible for
use of the CMGC delivery method, the department must consider the criteria
established in Subsection A of Section 13-1-122.3 NMSA 1978. The department must also ensure that any statutory
limitations, established by Section 67-3-8.4 NMSA 1978, on the use of the project
delivery method alternate to standard design-bid-build project procurement will
not be exceeded by the proposed use.
B. Scope of
services: The scope of any CMGC procurement shall
identify two separate phases of work to be performed:
(1) project specific range of
preconstruction services, including design consultation and obligation to
participate in project design, cost control, scheduling
and value engineering efforts; and
(2) construction services for the project
or work packages associated with the project at a guaranteed maximum price for
which the CMGC shall be financially responsible, in the event the second phase
of the contract is executed.
C. Procurement: The department shall select a CMGC for a
single project by using a sealed, qualifications-based proposal method, resulting
in a professional services agreement.
(1) The department will issue a request for
proposals (RFP) that contains, at a minimum, the elements established in
Section 13-1-122.4 NMSA 1978.
(2) The RFP may require separate
technical and price proposals.
(3) The RFP may require a minimum mandatory
technical score, minimum contractor prequalification score, or both.
(4) The RFP shall include forms
addressing required bid security, payment bonds and performance bonds in
conformance with Sections 13-1-146 and 13-4-18 NMSA 1978.
(5) The RFP may include use of a
short-list procedure.
[18.28.6.8 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.9 EVALUATION CRITERIA: The department shall evaluate proposals in
accordance with the evaluation criteria and scoring parameters set forth in the
RFP.
A. The evaluation
criteria may require, at a minimum, offerors demonstrate:
(1) construction experience with similar
projects;
(2) financial, manpower and equipment
resources available for the project;
(3) preconstruction or
design support experience;
(4) partnering approach to the project;
and
(5) approach to safety, risk, schedule,
and cost estimating.
B. The department may require offerors to participate in
formal interviews as part of the evaluation process.
[18.28.6.9 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.10 SELECTION
COMMITTEE:
The department shall use a selection
committee for the evaluation of the qualifications submitted by offerors and to
determine the offerors that qualify for award of the CMGC
contract.
A. The selection committee composition
shall be identified in the RFP; and
(1) shall include the following voting
members, a minimum of three of whom will be registered New Mexico professional
engineers:
(a) two employees of the department as
requested to serve on the committee designated by the chief engineer for the
department;
(b) two employees of the department as
requested to serve on the committee designated by the deputy secretary of
highway operations for the department;
(c) the employee of the department in
responsible charge of the project; and
(2) may include the following advisory
(non-voting) members:
(a) the department chief procurement
officer or designee;
(b) any other employee of the department
requested to serve by the secretary; or
(c) any other advisory members requested
to serve by the secretary based on industry recommendation.
B. No selection committee member may be an employee of
any offeror or firm selected to provide design services or independent cost
estimates for the project.
C. Every member of the selection committee must disclose
conflicts of interest pursuant to the requirements of state and federal ethics
and procurement laws and the department’s policies.
D. The selection committee will rank
offerors in accordance with the RFP evaluation and scoring criteria and provide
a recommendation for award to the secretary.
[18.28.6.10 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
18.28.6.11 AWARD OF CONTRACTS: Nothing in this rule requires the department
to award a contract during either of the contract phases.
A. The basis for selection for award of contract shall be
stated in the RFP and may be based on any of the following approaches:
(1) responsible offeror with lowest
priced, responsive proposal. If the RFP
includes minimum technical level, no proposal shall be considered responsive
unless it meets that level;
(2) responsible offeror whose proposal is
evaluated as providing the best value to the department;
(3) responsible offeror whose proposal is
evaluated as the most qualified; or
(4) other approaches determined by the chief
engineer or designee, which satisfy the requirements
of the procurement code.
B. The second phase construction services contract may be awarded
after the project plans have been sufficiently developed and the GMP for
construction services has been successfully validated and accepted by the
department.
C. In the event a GMP is not validated and accepted, the
department may:
(1) terminate the CMGC contract; and
(2) proceed to award the second phase
construction services contract through the competitive sealed bid process.
D. If the department proceeds to award the second phase
construction services contract through the competitive sealed bid process, the
CMGC is prohibited from bidding.
[18.28.6.11 NMAC -
N, 12/5/2023]
HISTORY OF 18.28.6
NMAC: [RESERVED]
Pre-NMAC History:
None