TITLE 6 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
EDUCATION
CHAPTER 27 PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY COUNCIL
PART 3 APPLICATION
AND GRANT ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS
RELATING
TO PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANS
6.27.3.1 ISSUING
AGENCY: Public School Capital Outlay Council.
[6.27.3.1
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.1 NMAC, 06/15/04]
6.27.3.2 SCOPE:
Public school capital outlay council, public school facilities
authority, and public school districts.
[6.27.3.2
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.2 NMAC, 06/15/04]
6.27.3.3 STATUTORY
AUTHORITY: The Public School Capital Outlay Act,
Sections 22-24-1 to 22-24-11 NMSA 1978.
[6.27.3.3
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.3 NMAC, 06/15/04; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.4 DURATION:
Permanent.
[6.27.3.4
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.4 NMAC, 06/15/04]
6.27.3.5 EFFECTIVE
DATE: June 15, 2004, unless a later date is cited
at the end of a section.
[6.27.3.5
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.5 NMAC, 06/15/04]
6.27.3.6 OBJECTIVE:
The objective of the rule is to establish application and grant
assistance procedures pursuant to the Public School Capital Outlay Act.
[6.27.3.6
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.6 NMAC, 06/15/04]
6.27.3.7 DEFINITIONS:
[RESERVED]
[6.27.3.7
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.7 NMAC, 06/15/04]
6.27.3.8 GENERAL
PROCEDURES:
A. The authority
shall present a proposed calendar and proposed application to the council prior
to the beginning of the allocation cycle for a given year.
B. The council
shall determine the estimated available funding for the allocation cycle for a
given year. The authority, at the
direction of the council, shall advise school districts of the funding
available for each allocation cycle and the resultant potential applicant
pool. In making the determination, the
council shall consider prior awards for phased
projects, contingencies, and phasing requirements as they pertain to current
rankings and estimated funding.
C. Condition index
ranking:
(1) In
accordance with the calendar established by the council, the authority shall
report to the council regarding the methodology used to determine the condition
index ranking, including any recommendations for affirming or refining the
methodology.
(2) The
authority, in cooperation with school districts, shall regularly review and
update the statewide data used to determine the condition index ranking. School districts shall regularly review and
provide corrections of inaccurate or missing data to the authority with respect
to the statewide data used to determine the condition index rating. In accordance with the timelines established
by the council, the authority shall transmit the application, the calendar, the
condition index rankings, and such other information as the council deems
relevant to all school districts.
(3) A
school district aggrieved by a determination of the authority regarding the
condition index ranking of a public school under the authority of the district
may appeal the matter to the council in accordance with the procedures
established in 6.27.1.10 NMAC. The
appeal must specify the data that the school district believes to be erroneous.
D. The authority
shall provide assistance to school districts with respect to the application
process and requirements, and preparation of the application, if necessary.
E. The authority
shall provide on-going analyses and technical assistance to school districts
with regard to:
(1) adequacy standards;
(2) master plans;
(3) educational specifications;
(4) preventive maintenance programs, including the
implementation and maintenance of the facility information management system
(FIMS);
(5) assessments used to determine whether a school building is
renovated or replaced;
(6) space utilization; and
(7) phasing, financing and cost benefit analyses.
F. The authority
shall establish procedures to ensure consultation with the secretary in the
event of any potential or perceived conflict between a proposed action of the
authority and an educational program.
[6.27.3.8
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.9 STATE/LOCAL
MATCH DETERMINATION. The department shall notify the council and
each school district of the state/local match for each school district for
every allocation cycle in accordance with the calendar established by the
council.
A. The match shall
be calculated annually in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph (5) of
Subsection B of Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978.
In calculating the match:
(1) the
final prior year net taxable value for the school district means the net
taxable value for the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in
which the allocation is made;
(2) the MEM for the school district is the average
full-time-equivalent enrollment of students attending public schools, including
charter schools, in a school district on the eightieth and one hundred
twentieth days of the prior school year; the state MEM is the total final
funded MEM for the prior school year as reported by the department.
B. The notification
shall include the net taxable value, the sum of the property tax mill levies,
and the MEM used to determine the state/local match.
C. If a school
district believes that either the prior year net taxable value for the school
district or the MEM used to calculate the state/local match is incorrect, the
school district shall notify the department within thirty (30) days of
receiving the notification and shall provide documentation as to the data the
school district believes to be correct.
The department shall review the information provided by the school
district and notify the school district and the council of its determination
within thirty (30) days of receiving the school district’s objections.
D. A school district recognized by the
council for conducting an exemplary preventive maintenance program pursuant to
Subsection G of 6.27.3.11 NMAC, may be eligible for a reduction in local match
of up to five percent (5%) on capital outlay awards.
E. Projects which
receive phased project funding over multiple award cycles will maintain the
state/local match ratio of the year when the project was initially awarded,
except in extraordinary circumstances as determined by the council.
[6.27.3.9
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.10 SPECIAL
APPROPRIATION REJECTION: OFFSET.
A. The school
district must determine whether to accept or reject any legislative
appropriation made after January 1, 2003 for non-operating purposes either
directly to the subject school district or to another governmental entity for
the purpose of passing the money through directly to the subject school
district, but excluding educational technology appropriations made prior to
January 1, 2005 and reauthorizations of appropriations previously made to the
school district. This includes
determinations with regard to direct appropriations for charter schools within
the school district. After January 1,
2007, determinations regarding appropriations for non-operating purposes to a
specific state-chartered charter school shall be made by the charter school
unless the appropriation was previously used to calculate a reduction pursuant
to this section regardless of whether the charter school is a state-chartered
charter school at the time of the appropriation or later becomes a
state-chartered school.
(1) The
school district must notify the department of finance and administration and
the public education department in writing that it is rejecting an
appropriation prior to June 1 of the fiscal year during which the appropriation
is made.
(2) The
rejection of the direct appropriation must be supported by the affirmative
action of the local school board.
(3) Submission
of the completed questionnaire for a project funded by a direct legislative
appropriation and the corresponding sale of the bonds will be deemed to
constitute the school district’s acceptance of the project.
B. Any direct
appropriation not otherwise excepted from this
requirement and not rejected by the school district shall result in the
application of the offset as calculated pursuant to Paragraph (6) of Subsection
B of Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978. The
total of direct appropriations shall include an amount, certified to the
council by the department, equal to the educational technology appropriations
made to the subject school district on or after January 1, 2003 and prior to
January 1, 2005 and not previously used to offset distributions pursuant to the
Technology for Education Act. All
federal money disbursed to a school district for non-operating purposes
pursuant to Title XIV of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
shall also result in the application of the offset pursuant to this subsection.
(1) The
total shall exclude one-half of the amount of any appropriation made or
reauthorized after January 1, 2007 if the purpose of the appropriation or
reauthorization is to fund, in whole or in part, a capital outlay project that,
when prioritized by the council pursuant to this section either in the
immediately preceding funding cycle or in the current funding cycle, ranked in
the top one hundred and fifty projects statewide.
(2) The
total shall exclude the proportionate share of any appropriation made or
reauthorized after January 1, 2008 for a capital project that will be jointly
used by a governmental entity other than the subject school district. A school district proposing to jointly use a
facility funded from a capital outlay appropriation shall submit a joint-use
agreement executed between the district and governmental entity which details
the terms of the proportional use as well as any future capital, operational
and maintenance costs associated with the facility. The council shall determine the proportionate
share to be used by the district and provide this information to the department
to include in the calculation of the applicable offset. Joint-use agreements requests received prior
to June 1 of the fiscal year will be calculated into the offset applicable to
each school district for the current standards-based award cycle. Joint-use agreements requests received after
June 1 of the fiscal year will carry-forward and be applicable to future award
cycles under the standards-based process.
[6.27.3.10
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.11 PREVENTIVE
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM:
A. Each school
district, including those school districts not applying for grant assistance
pursuant to the Public School Capital Outlay Act, shall develop and implement a
preventive maintenance plan meeting the requirements of this section.
B. A school
district shall not be eligible for funding pursuant to Section 22-24-5 NMSA
1978 unless:
(1) the
school district has implemented a preventive maintenance plan that has been
approved by the council; and which plan has subsequently been updated within
the last twelve (12) months for any changes in facilities, equipment, available
resources, new policies, new procedures, and added capabilities; and
(2) the school district is effectively using the facility
information management system (FIMS).
C. The preventive
maintenance plan for each public school building, including portable classrooms
and any charter school buildings under the authority of the school district,
must at a minimum include:
(1) the
maintenance mission statement and maintenance goals which specify the broad
purpose of the maintenance department and list the goals to be undertaken
during the next twelve (12) months;
(2) the
maintenance organization and staffing responsibilities, by providing an
organization chart depicting the supervisory chain for directing maintenance
and custodial activities, and listing the general responsibilities of each
group;
(3) the
maintenance priorities and procedures, by listing the priorities for the
accomplishment of maintenance related work and providing implemented procedures
for the conduct of the maintenance program, such as work order processing,
material and equipment acquisition, contractor oversight, safety, staff
professional development, equipment upgrades and data updates;
(4) equipment inspection and maintenance schedules which shall
provide the schedule for the reoccurring inspection and maintenance, at
prescribed frequencies, for all facility systems and equipment;
(5) scheduled
preventive maintenance tasks which detail the specific inspection and
maintenance requirements to be employed;
(6) established custodial duties, responsibilities, and a
schedule of tasks performed at each of its schools; and
(7) major maintenance, repair and replacement projects required
to be in its current facility master plan that the school district will execute
under the capital renewal program.
D. The school
district’s preventive maintenance program includes scheduled activities
intended to provide fully functional and reliable building systems aimed at
advancing the learning process, providing healthy, safe conditions and
preventing breakdowns and premature failures.
Common tasks consist of diagnostic tests, inspections, cleaning,
lubrication, calibration and replacement of expendable components of building
systems and equipment to address each of the following school facility systems
and elements:
(1) substructure; including foundations and floor slabs;
(2) shell; including exterior walls, doors, windows, roof
coverings and openings;
(3) interior; floors, walls, partitions, ceilings, interior
doors, equipment rooms and restrooms;
(4) services;
including electrical distribution, lighting, fire and life safety equipment,
heating; ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration equipment, plumbing
fixtures, elevators and lifts;
(5) equipment; including kitchen equipment and furnishings; and
(6) sitework;
including roadways and parking lots, fencing and walls, sidewalks, grounds
drainage, signage, playgrounds and exterior utility distribution.
E. All school
districts shall participate in the facility information management system
(FIMS) in accordance with the schedule and policies adopted by the council. The facility information management system
shall:
(1) provide for a comprehensive and systematized process for
identifying maintenance requirements, scheduling work and documenting completed
work; and
(2) provide a database of maintenance and related service
activities to allow for analysis and decision making for school district and
statewide maintenance efforts, with maintenance measures established and
periodic analysis conducted by both school districts and the authority to
identify opportunities for improved school facilities.
F. Commensurate
with the above provisions, school districts shall provide comprehensive
professional development programs for its maintenance personnel to provide
requisite skills and the authority will assist as necessary with implementing
such programs.
G. A school
district identified by the council to have an exemplary preventive maintenance
program may be eligible for up to a five percent (5%) reduction in its local
match on a capital outlay award.
(1) Exemplary
maintenance is demonstrated by achieving and sustaining optimum performance of
all building systems expected useful life anticipated to be met or exceeded
through highly efficient use of resources.
(2) The
council shall annually review and adopt the specific criteria and process for
confirming that a district is demonstrating exemplary maintenance.
[6.27.2.11
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.12 APPLICATIONS: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:
A. The application
must verify that the school district has submitted a five-year facilities
plan. The facilities plan must include:
(1) enrollment projections, which are updated at the beginning
of each fiscal year and reflect the final funded membership for the prior
school year;
(2) projections for facilities needed to maintain a full-day
kindergarten program;
(3) the school district's mission statement, facility goals and
objectives, and the steps taken by the school district to address the priority
of needs. The goals and objectives
should address how the master plan supports the educational programs and needs
of the district;
(4) a prioritization of the district's capital needs, including
maintenance-related capital renewal;
(5) description of community involvement in the development of
the master plan;
(6) if
the application or master plan establish ranked priorities for public school
capital outlay projects within the district that do not conform with the
condition index rankings of public school buildings within the school district,
the school district must provide a detailed explanation as to the rationale for
the difference;
(7) a
map of the school district addressing, at a minimum, the following
factors: location of all current sites,
land owned by the school district, location of any planned expansion
(indicating whether the site is owned by the school district), school district
growth areas and other school district facilities; and
(8) addressing of the facilities needs of charter schools
located within the school district.
B. The application
must assure that the school district is willing and able to pay any portion of
the public school capital outlay project that is not funded with grant
assistance from the fund and must provide information on the anticipated source
of the local share, the timelines for ensuring the local share and any known
contingencies in ensuring the local share.
C. The application
must address the needs of any charter school located in the school district or
provide documentation that the facilities of the charter school has a smaller
deviation from the statewide adequacy standards than other district facilities
included in the application.
D. The application
must include a preventive maintenance program meeting the requirements of
6.27.3.11 NMAC.
E. The application
must address how the school district preventive maintenance program complies
with the requirements of 6.27.3.11 NMAC.
F. If the proposed
project exceeds the statewide adequacy standards, the application must provide
a detailed explanation of the variance and a cost analysis of the cost of
meeting the statewide adequacy standards and the excess costs associated with
exceeding the statewide adequacy standards.
G. If the
application is for a charter school located in privately owned facilities, the
district must include documentation sufficient to ensure that the provisions of
Article IX, Section 14 of the Constitution of New Mexico (the “anti-donation
clause”) are not violated and that there were no violations of any conflict of
interest laws.
H. Special
provision: building systems initiative.
(1) A
school district desiring a grant award for building system repair, renovation
or replacement shall submit an application on a form approved by the
council. The application shall include
an assessment of the building system that the repair, renovation or replacement
of which would extend the useful life of the building itself.
(2) The
authority shall verify the assessment.
The council shall prioritize applications for assistance pursuant to the
building systems initiative using a special condition ranking index.
(3) The
council shall approve applications on the established priority basis to the
extent of available funds. No project
shall be approved unless the council determines that the school district is
willing and able to pay the portion of the total project cost not funded with
grant assistance from the fund. The
state share of the cost of an approved project is calculated pursuant to the
methodology in Paragraph (5) of Subsection B of Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978.
(4) Building
system repair, renovation or replacement funded under this program shall be
expeditiously completed. Any grants made
pursuant to this subsection shall be expended by the school district within
three years of the grant allocation.
[6.27.3.12
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10; A, 06/15/16]
6.27.3.13 GRANT ASSISTANCE DETERMINATIONS:
A. The council
shall consider all applications meeting the requirements of this rule and,
after public hearing and consideration of recommendations by the authority and
by any subcommittee that may be appointed by the chair for this purpose,
approve those applications selected for grant assistance during the allocation
cycle.
B. The council
shall prioritize all applications using the statewide adequacy standards. The amount of outstanding deviation from the
standards as shown in the New Mexico condition index ranking shall be used by
the council in evaluating and prioritizing public school capital outlay
projects; provided however, that the council may fashion such solutions to the
needs established by the rankings as appropriate and also, in making its awards
based on the priorities, the council may consider:
(1) the timeliness of a district’s ability to provide its match;
(2) phasing possibilities or the ability to totally fund and
complete a project;
(3) the need for additional planning time;
(4) the inability of a district to be able to effectuate
multiple awards in terms of actual construction;
(5) the status of the district’s financial audits;
(6) the impact on its educational program; and
(7) such other factors as the council may deem relevant or
appropriate.
C. Notwithstanding
the provisions of subsection B of this section, in an emergency in which the
council determines that the health or safety of students or school personnel is
at immediate risk or where there is a threat of significant property damage if
immediate action is not taken, the council may award emergency grant assistance
pursuant to Subsection C of 6.27.2.9 NMAC for a project using criteria other
than the statewide adequacy standards.
D. The council
shall make its allocations for grant assistance in a manner that the council
determines will maximize the utilization of the available funding for any given
allocation cycle. This determination may
include allocations for grant assistance for one or more phases of a project
upon the recommendation of the authority and any subcommittee of the council
appointed by the chair for this purpose.
E. An application
for grant assistance shall not be approved unless the council makes a
determination that:
(1) the public school capital outlay project is needed and is
included in the school district’s top priorities;
(2) the school district has used its resources in a prudent
manner as demonstrated by the school district’s adherence to the priorities
established in its master plan, its implementation of a preventive maintenance
plan and such other information as the council finds relevant;
(3) the school district has provided insurance for buildings of
the local school district in accordance with the provisions of Section 13-5-3
NMSA 1978;
(4) the school district has submitted a five-year facilities
plan that meets the requirements of Subsection A of Section 6.27.3.12 of this
rule;
(5) the school district has implemented an updated preventive
maintenance plan and is effectively utilizing the facility information
management system (FIMS) to meet the requirements of 6.27.3.11 of this rule;
(6)
school district is willing and able to pay any portion
of the total cost of the public school capital outlay project not funded with
grant assistance from the fund;
(7) the
school district has addressed the capital needs of any charter schools located
in the district by including the needs in the application or demonstrating that
the facilities of the charter school has a smaller deviation from the statewide
adequacy standards than other district facilities included in the application;
and
(8) the school district has agreed in writing to comply with any
reporting requirements or conditions established by the council pursuant to
Section 22-24-5.1 NMSA 1978. The school
district must acknowledge that the council may direct that the authority manage
and provide direct administration of the project, either as a condition of
approval of the project or upon a finding by the council that the project is
repeatedly in substantial noncompliance with any reporting requirement or
condition.
F. Upon
recommendation of the authority, the council shall determine whether direct or
indirect project management by the authority shall apply to the project. In making its recommendation, the authority
shall consider:
(1) the district’s preference and financial capabilities,
including a determination by the council authorizing direct payment to the
contractor;
(2) the district’s capacity, including training and
certification in procurement and contract requirements; and
(3) the authority’s staffing capacity.
G. Approval of a
project by the council may include such necessary and reasonable conditions or
contingencies imposed by the council to ensure that the project meets the
requirements of law and rule and is effectively and prudently administered and
managed.
[6.27.3.13
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.14 CALCULATION
OF GRANT ASSISTANCE:
A. The amount of an
award for grant assistance for a project shall be determined as follows:
(1) Total
project cost means the total amount necessary to complete the public school
capital outlay project less:
(a) any insurance reimbursement received by the school district
for the project; and
(b) any amount attributable to costs associated with aspects of
a project that exceed the statewide adequacy standards.
(2) The
final state share amount of the total project cost is determined by:
(a) applying the ratio calculated pursuant to 6.27.3.9 NMAC in
accordance with the requirements of Paragraph (5) of Subsection B of Section
22-24-5 NMSA 1978 to the total project cost to produce the state share amount;
(b) subtracting
from the state share amount the amount calculated pursuant to Paragraph (6) of
Subsection B of Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978; and
(c) in instances where a project will utilize a lease with
option to purchase arrangement, the final state share amount may be in the form
of additional lease costs for leasehold improvements.
B. Notwithstanding
the requirements of Subsection A of this section:
(1) If
the council determines that a district has used all of its local resources and
that the district is not expected to have any available local resources by a
date determined annually by the council, the council may adjust the amount of
local share otherwise required. Before
making any adjustment to the local share, the council shall consider whether:
(a) the
school district has insufficient bonding capacity over the next four years to
provide the local match necessary to complete the project and, for all
educational purposes, has a residential property tax rate of at least ten
dollars ($10.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, as
measured by the sum of all rates imposed by resolution of the local school
board plus rates set to pay interest and principal on outstanding school
district general obligation bonds; or
(b) the school district:
(i) has fewer than an average of eight hundred
full-time-equivalent students on the fortieth, eightieth and one hundred
twentieth days of the prior school year;
(ii) has at least seventy percent of its
students eligible for free or reduced fee lunch;
(iii) has
a share of the total project cost, as calculated pursuant to provisions of this
section, that would be greater than fifty percent; and
(iv) for
all educational purposes, has a residential property tax rate of at least seven
dollars ($7.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, as
measured by the sum of all rates imposed by resolution of the local school
board plus rates set to pay interest and principal on outstanding school
district general obligation bonds; or
(c) the school district has:
(i) an enrollment growth rate over the previous school year of
at least two and one-half percent;
(ii) pursuant to its five-year facilities plan, will be building
a new school within the next two years; and
(iii) for
all educational purposes, has a residential property tax rate of at least ten
dollars ($10.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, as
measured by the sum of all rates imposed by resolution of the local school
board plus rates set to pay interest and principal on outstanding school
district general obligation bonds.
(2) Allocations
from the fund made by the council for the purpose of demolishing abandoned
school district facilities provide that the council may enter into an agreement
with the school district under which an amount equal to the savings to the
district in lower insurance premiums are used to reimburse the fund fully or
partially for the demolition costs allocated to the district.
C. Amounts awarded
to school districts may be adjusted if the council determines that a previous
award is insufficient to bring a project to statewide adequacy standards. A school district may apply for an adjustment
to a previous award of grant assistance by submitting an application on the
current, approved, and designated form detailing the additional state and local
match funds necessary to bring the school to adequacy.
D. In instances
where the district lacks the additional funds to meet the local share of the
project, the award may be adjusted by the council upon approval of an
application submitted by the district on the current, approved, and designated
form. The authority, in consultation
with the public education department shall review the applicant school
district’s financial position presented in the application and make a
recommendation to the council whether an awards adjustment should be
considered. The council shall use the
criteria provided in Section 22-24-5(B)(8)(a) and (b)
NMSA 1978 to determine whether an adjustment be made. An adjustment may include increasing the
state share together with an increase for the local match for the project.
E. In addition to
considering an adjustment of the local share pursuant to Subsections B or D of
this section, the council may consider granting a local share advance if the
council determines that a need exists to complete the project in a timely
manner and the school district affirms its willingness and ability to repay the
advance within 48 months of the granting of the advance.
[6.27.3.14
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.15 PORTABLE
CLASSROOMS:
A. The
council may authorize expenditures from the public school capital outlay fund
to purchase portable classroom buildings for loan to school districts to meet a
temporary requirement. The council has
authorized the authority to administer its portable classroom loan program in
the manner set forth in this rule. Purchases of portable classroom buildings
not associated with a capital outlay project award require specific
authorization by the council. When an
award includes provisions to use allocations from the public school capital
outlay fund to purchase portable classroom buildings as part of that project,
no further approval is required from the council for the portables to be
purchased. Such portables, however,
remain the property of the council, and when they are no longer needed by a
school district because of the construction of permanent facilities, the school
district shall return the portables to the authority. Nothing in this rule applies to portable
classroom buildings purchased with school district funds. Should a school district find that it no
longer needs a portable classroom building purchased with school district
funds, the authority, may purchase the portable classroom building from the
school district. Such a purchase would
need council approval only if the purchase is not associated with a capital
outlay award for another district.
B. The authority
shall develop applications for loan, transfer or return of state-owned portable
classroom buildings. Applications shall
be signed by the school district superintendent and shall be delivered to the
authority regional manager of the region in which the school district is
located. The application for loan of
portable classrooms shall address, at a minimum:
(1) the need for loan of portable classrooms, including
explanation of why the needs of district cannot be met using existing facilities;
(2) description of the proposed use of portable classrooms;
(3) the anticipated duration of the loan;
(4) the ability of the district to maintain and provide
insurance of the portable classrooms while in the custody of the district, and
that the portable classrooms will be included in the district preventive
maintenance program;
(5) the number of units requested; and
(6) the anticipated duration of the loan.
C. The application
for return or transfer of portable classrooms shall address, at a minimum:
(1) the reason(s) the district no longer needs the portable
classrooms or no longer needs the portable classroom at its present location
but needs them elsewhere;
(2) the manner in which the district is addressing the need(s)
that occasioned the request for portable classrooms;
(3) the effective date of the proposed return or transfer; and
(4) a detailed description of the current condition of the
portable classrooms.
D. Applications
for loan, transfer or return of state owned portable classroom buildings shall
be submitted to the authority. The
application will be reviewed by the director of the authority, who shall make a
determination of approval or denial, and notify the school district of the
determination in writing. The director
shall periodically report to the council with respect to the applications
granted or denied.
E. A portable
classroom use agreement shall be required for portable classroom units loaned
for each school site. The agreement
shall require the signatures of the district superintendent and the director,
or their designees. The term of use
shall not exceed five (5) years. Such
agreements may be renewed and the term extended for additional five (5) year
intervals if the district makes a written request to the authority no later
than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the term of the current
agreement. If the school district
determines that a portable classroom is no longer required during the term of
the current agreement, the school district must provide written notification to
the authority at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date the
portable classroom is no longer required.
All rights and responsibilities of the parties to the portable classroom
use agreement shall remain in effect under the terms of the agreement until
such time as the authority determines to allow early release of the school
district from the terms of the agreement.
F. The school
district is responsible for making the arrangements for and paying all expenses
related to disconnecting and transporting the portable classroom from its
current location, and all site preparation, utility extensions, permits and
other costs for placement at a new location.
Additionally, the relocation of the portable must comply with the requirements
of 6.27.2.12 NMAC.
G. The school
district, at its sole expense shall keep, repair and maintain the portable
classroom and all related improvements in a reasonable state of repair and
preservation and shall not suffer or permit any continuing nuisance
thereon. The portable classroom shall be
maintained in an as is or better condition as existed when the district took
possession of the building. This will
include preventive maintenance on the building systems and installed equipment
in accordance with the school district’s preventive maintenance plan. All renovations, upgrades and building
modifications shall become the responsibility of the receiving school district.
H. The council may,
in its discretion, authorize the authority to permanently transfer portable
classrooms to the district or otherwise permanently dispose of the portable
classrooms in accordance with Chapter 13, Article 6 NMSA 1978.
[6.27.3.15
NMAC - Rp, 6.27.2.13 NMAC, 06/15/04; A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.16 ASSISTANCE
FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL LEASE PAYMENTS:
A. Applications for
assistance to school districts for the purpose of making lease payments for
classroom facilities shall be made to the authority by the school
district. Classroom facilities include
the space needed, as determined by the minimum required under statewide
adequacy standards for the direct administration of school activities. Only charter schools are eligible to receive
grants for the purpose of assistance with making lease payments for classroom
facilities pursuant to a lease purchase agreement. Applications for such lease
assistance on behalf of locally chartered charter schools shall be made to the
authority through the school district; provided, however, that if the school
district fails to make an application on behalf of a charter school, the
charter school may submit its application directly to the authority. A state chartered charter school shall submit
its application directly to the authority.
The application must contain all supporting documentation, including:
(1) a copy of the lease or lease purchase agreement;
(2) the annualized cost of the lease for the fiscal year for
which the school seeks assistance; and
(3) the MEM using leased classroom facilities, as determined by
calculating:
(a) the average full-time-equivalent enrollment using leased
classroom facilities on the eightieth and one hundred twentieth days of the
prior school year; or
(b) in
the case of an approved charter school that has not commenced classroom
instruction, the estimated full-time-equivalent enrollment that will use leased
classroom facilities in the first year of instruction, as shown in the approved
charter school application, provided that, after the eightieth day of the
school year, the MEM shall be adjusted to reflect the full-time-equivalent
enrollment on that date.
B. The amount of a
grant to a school district shall not exceed:
(1) the
actual annual lease payments owed for leasing classroom space for schools,
including charter schools, in the district; or
(2) seven
hundred dollars ($700) multiplied by the number of MEM using the leased
classroom facilities; provided that in fiscal year 2009 and in each subsequent
fiscal year, this amount shall be adjusted by the percentage increase between
the penultimate calendar year and the immediately preceding calendar year of
the consumer price index for the United States, all items, as published by the
United States department of labor.
C. A grant received
for the lease payments of a charter school may be used by that charter school
as a state match necessary to obtain federal grants.
D. At the end of
each fiscal year, any unexpended or unencumbered balance of the appropriation
shall revert to the fund.
E. The authority
shall consult with the department regarding applications for charter school
lease assistance and provide recommendations to the council regarding the
applications.
[6.27.3.16
NMAC - N, 06/15/04; A, 08/31/05, A, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.17 ASSISTANCE
FOR FACILITY MASTER PLANNING:
A. All facility
master plans are required to meet the requirements and guidelines of the
authority’s school district facilities master plan components and guidelines.
B. Council
assistance will be granted only to create a new facility master plan and upon
expiration of a current plan, except in cases of high growth within a school
district which may warrant modification of the plan prior to expiration of its
five-year term. Annual updates to
existing master plans are the responsibility of the school district.
C. The school
district shall not be under current contract with a facilities master plan
contractor prior to award by the council to be eligible for funding in the
award cycle.
D. The facilities
master plan shall be completed and reviewed by the authority within one year of
the grant award or awarded funds may revert.
E. Except as
provided in Paragraph (1) below, no grant for facilities master planning shall
be made unless the council determines that the school district is willing and
able to pay the local portion of the total cost of developing or updating the
facility master plan. The local portion
shall be determined pursuant to 6.27.3.9 NMAC.
(1) An
allocation from the fund may be used to pay the total cost of developing or
updating the facility master plan if:
(a) the
school district has fewer that an average of six hundred full-time-equivalent
students on the eightieth and one hundred twentieth days of the prior school
year; or
(b) the school district meets all of the following requirements;
(i) the school district has fewer than an average of one
thousand full-time equivalent students on the eightieth and one hundred
twentieth days of the prior school year;
(ii) the school district has at least seventy percent of its
students eligible for free or reduced-fee lunch;
(iii) the
state share of the total cost, if calculated pursuant to the methodology in
Paragraph (5) of Subsection B of Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978, would be less than
fifty percent; and
(iv) for all educational purposes, the school district has a
residential property tax rate of at least seven dollars on each one thousand
dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, as measured by the sum of all rates imposed
by resolution of the local school board plus rates set to pay interest and
principal on outstanding school district general obligation bonds.
(2) If
reduction/waiver or advance of local match is being requested, a school
district must submit an application on the current, approved, and designated
form and certify that no other funds are available.
[6.27.3.17
NMAC - N, 08/31/05; 6.27.3.17 NMAC - N, 07/15/10]
6.27.3.18 CHARTER
SCHOOL FACILITIES: REQUIREMENTS AND GRANT ASSISTANCE:
A. The facilities
of a charter school approved on or after July 1, 2005 and before July 1, 2010
shall meet educational occupancy standards required by applicable New Mexico
construction codes. Existing facilities
of a charter school approved prior to July 1, 2005 shall be evaluated,
prioritized and eligible for grants pursuant to the Public School Capital
Outlay Act in the same manner as all other public schools; provided that for
charter schools in leased facilities, grants may only be used as additional
lease payments for leasehold improvements.
B. On or after July
1, 2010, an application for a charter shall not be approved and an existing
charter shall not be renewed unless the charter school:
(1) is housed in a public facility that is:
(a) owned
by the charter school, the school district, the state, an institution of the
state, another political subdivision of the state, the federal government or
one of its agencies or a tribal government; and
(b) subject
to evaluation and prioritization and eligible for grants pursuant to the Public
School Capital Outlay Act in the same manner as all other public schools in the
state; or
(2) if it is not housed in a public building described in
Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph (1) of this subsection, demonstrates that:
(a) the
facility in which the charter school is housed meets the statewide adequacy
standards developed pursuant to the Public School Capital Outlay Act and the
owner of the facility is contractually obligated to maintain those standards at
no additional cost to the charter school or the state; and
(b) either:
(i) public buildings are not available or adequate for the
educational program of the charter school; or
(ii) the owner of the facility is a nonprofit entity specifically
organized for the purpose of providing the facility for the charter school.
C. When a charter
school proposes to use a public facility, prior to the occupancy of the public
facility by the charter school the charter school shall notify the council of
the intended use, together with such other information as requested by the
authority.
(1) Within
sixty days of the notification to the council, the authority shall assess the
public facility in order to determine the extent of compliance with the
statewide adequacy standards and the amount of outstanding deviation from those
standards. The results of the assessment shall be submitted to the charter
school, the school district in which the charter school is located and the
council.
(2) Once
assessed pursuant to Paragraph (1) of this subsection, the public facility
shall be prioritized and eligible for grants pursuant to the Public School
Capital Outlay Act in the same manner as all other public schools in the state.
D. All charter
schools shall have an established preventive maintenance program, either
through its host school district, the property owner or its own resources. The established preventive maintenance
procedures shall be in writing, be updated annually, and must include
provisions for the timely inspection of life safety systems.
[6.27.3.18
NMAC - Rn & A, 6.27.3.17 NMAC, 07/15/10]
HISTORY OF 6.27.3 NMAC:
History of Repealed Material:
6.27.2
NMAC, Application and Award Procedures, filed 11/1/2000 - Repealed effective
06/15/04.